Skip to content

PEP 828: Mark as Accepted - #5071

Merged
hugovk merged 1 commit into
python:mainfrom
ZeroIntensity:pep-828/accept
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

PEP 828: Mark as Accepted#5071
hugovk merged 1 commit into
python:mainfrom
ZeroIntensity:pep-828/accept

Conversation

@ZeroIntensity

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
  • Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
  • Resolution field points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g. `01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/t/12345/100>`__)
  • Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
  • Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

@read-the-docs-community

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Documentation build overview

📚 pep-previews | 🛠️ Build #33891135 | 📁 Comparing ea7804b against latest (69a447a)

  🔍 Preview build  

5 files changed · ± 5 modified

± Modified

@hugovk hugovk left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First accepted PEP for 3.16! 🚀

@hugovk
hugovk merged commit 0475dc3 into python:main Aug 5, 2026
5 checks passed
@ZeroIntensity
ZeroIntensity deleted the pep-828/accept branch August 5, 2026 13:32
@ZeroIntensity

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Was PEP 797 the first rejected PEP for 3.16 as well? 😁

@hugovk

hugovk commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes, double congratulations!

You'll have to find another unique end state for 842 :)

@ZeroIntensity

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Ha, I was planning to withdraw it if the upcoming revision doesn't go over well. I don't feel as bad about that plan anymore 😀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants