Skip to content

docs(ticket-049): Validator autonomy audit, operator guide and follow-up tickets - #67

Open
tom-sapletta-com wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
ticket/049-validator-autonomy-plan
Open

docs(ticket-049): Validator autonomy audit, operator guide and follow-up tickets#67
tom-sapletta-com wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
ticket/049-validator-autonomy-plan

Conversation

@tom-sapletta-com

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ticket: ticket-049
Correlation ID: todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan

Summary

Planning-only PR: autonomy audit after the GOV-APPROVAL stall on PR #66, an operator guide for direct-pr / scan-direct, and scaffolded follow-up tickets 050–052.

Contents

  • project/ticket-049/AUTONOMY_AND_REFACTOR_PLAN.md — failure modes, agent process fixes, phases A–D
  • project/ticket-049/OPERATOR_GUIDE.md — triage and dispatch commands
  • project/ticket-050 — own or exclude CHANGELOG.md / .env.example
  • project/ticket-051 — CI wiring of github-event-log with explicit flags
  • project/ticket-052 — promote checklist into AGENTS.md

All tickets remain PLAN / WAIT_FOR_APPROVAL. No executable source or workflow change.

Note

Does not merge PR #66. Ticket-048 stays the active implementation ticket on its own branch.

tom-sapletta-com and others added 5 commits August 6, 2026 18:06
Record why GOV-APPROVAL autonomy failed for todo2code (variables without
scan-direct matrix), ship the operator guide and ordered refactor plan, and
scaffold tickets 050-052 for unowned root paths, CI wiring of github-event-log,
and AGENTS.md checklist promotion. All remain PLAN / WAIT_FOR_APPROVAL.
Cross-link twin-probes publication.gate (diagnostic probe, not trust root),
validator freeze dispatcher, and skills-agent process. Record external PR
landings and GitHub Actions outage as a publication blocker.
Conditions 1-8 of steady-state autonomy all held for PR #66 on 2026-08-06 and
no review appeared. Adds precondition 9: the validator run must actually obtain
a runner.

Records the zero-steps signature — a job with no steps that is then cancelled
never started — as the way to tell an infrastructure stall from a validator
rejection, which always produces steps and a verdict.

Also warns against the inference this section originally drew: during an
Actions major_outage an uneven backlog is not evidence of an organization
budget problem, because a repository that keeps draining is not a control
group.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
make governance compares the working tree to HEAD; the CI job compares
base..head. Diagnostics that are properties of the branch rather than the edit
— GOV-INTENT-003, GOV-TICKET-001, workstream scope over the full diff — are
therefore invisible before a push.

project/governance-check.sh already accepts --actor ci --base --head and
reproduces the CI verdict locally in under a second. Nothing prompts anyone to
run it, so the verdict arrives from a failed pull request instead: PR #64
consumed a full CI round on four jobs before failing GOV-TICKET-001.

Plan-only. Wrap-only boundary over the existing checker: no second
implementation, no new diagnostic, no automatically installed Git hook.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…tion

make governance compares the working tree to HEAD; CI compares base..head.
GOV-INTENT-003, GOV-TICKET-001 and branch-wide workstream scope are therefore
invisible locally, which is how PR #64 burned a full CI round before failing.

README.md now carries the invocation, a blocking exit policy, and the
requirement to run it from the branch being pushed — the checker reads the
active ticket from the working tree, so running it elsewhere judges one
branch's diff against another branch's ticket.

Proven against real history in isolated worktrees: the squashed ticket-047
topology fails GOV-TICKET-001, the ticket-048 topology passes.

Makefile and AGENTS.md were both attempted first and rejected by the rules
themselves: Makefile routes to the integration workstream via requiredForPaths,
and AGENTS.md is hash-locked in managedFiles.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ifuri-validator-agent[bot]
ifuri-validator-agent Bot previously approved these changes Aug 7, 2026

@ifuri-validator-agent ifuri-validator-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deterministic Validator approval for exact head bb89df22e4758fb3680a438860b25949d74e0317.

Ticket: ticket-049
Correlation ID: todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan
Model: openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2
Reviewed diff chunks: 6
Advisory LLM verdict: APPROVE
Advisory summary: Reviewed all 6 diff chunk(s). Documentation-only planning PR introducing ticket-049 (autonomy audit, operator guide, refactor plan) plus scaffolded backlog tickets 050-053 and index updates to README, TODO, and TICKETS.md. No executable source, workflow, CI, or configuration changes are present in this chunk. All new tickets remain in PLAN/WAIT_FOR_APPROVAL state, and the PR body explicitly states no executable changes. All provided test checks pass (verify, Java adapter, koru/code-review; one opt-in check skipped). No security-relevant code paths introduced. | This chunk adds documentation for ticket-049: an autonomy/refactor plan and an operator guide. The PR is explicitly planning-only with no executable source or workflow changes. The visible content is documentation describing triage procedures, diagnostic commands, and anti-patterns. No test failures are present in the test results data. | This is a documentation-only PR (ticket-049) adding planning artifacts: an autonomy audit, operator guide, refactor plan, and sibling ticket scaffolds under project/ticket-049/**, 050, 051, 052, plus index updates. The intent.json correctly scopes allowed paths, sets maxImplementationFiles to 0, and lists no stacks or runtime dependencies. No executable source, CI, or workflow changes are present. All test checks in test_results_data are PASS or SKIPPING; none are failing. | This chunk adds governance evidence files (preprompt, README, intent.json, changelog, agent notes) for tickets 049-051. It is planning-only scaffolding with no executable code, workflow changes, or secrets. Tests are reported as PASS with no failures. | This diff chunk contains planning documentation and governance notes for tickets 052 and 053. The changes are markdown files, JSON intent files, and log files. No executable source code, workflow modifications, or secrets are introduced. Ticket 052 promotes a governance checklist, and ticket 053 documents a pre-push governance gate invocation. All test checks in the provided data are passing. | This chunk contains ticket-053 documentation and metadata files (ai-claude.md, changelog.md, intent.json, preprompt.md). The ticket documents a governance pre-push rule in README.md, wrapping the existing governance-check.sh in CI form. No executable source, workflow, or locked file changes are present. The diff is documentation and intent metadata only, with clear non-goals and rollback plan. Test results show verify PASS and no failed checks.
Advisory findings: none
The LLM output above is advisory and was not used as the approval trust root.
Merge was not requested or performed.

Decision record (recomputable)

DECISION D-049-4618
TICKET ticket-049
HEAD_SHA bb89df22e4758fb3680a438860b25949d74e0317
CORRELATION_ID todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan
ACTOR agent:ifuri-validator-agent[bot]
APPLIED_RULE P-CORE-015
INPUT author_login = "tom-sapletta-com"
INPUT observed_checks = ["Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","verify=PASS","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","koru / code-review=PASS","Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","verify=PASS"]
INPUT required_checks = ["verify","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)","koru / code-review"]
INPUT required_checks_source = "env/request"
INPUT reviewer_login = "ifuri-validator-agent[bot]"
VERDICT APPROVE AUTHORITY DETERMINISTIC
REJECTED REQUEST_CHANGES BECAUSE NO_UNSAFE_CHANGE_REASON_FOUND
ADVISORY llm_verdict = "APPROVE" MODEL "openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2"
ASSERT VERDICT_AUTHORITY != "ADVISORY"

Validator append-only log (ticket-032 AC-04).
ifuri-validator-agent[bot]
ifuri-validator-agent Bot previously approved these changes Aug 7, 2026

@ifuri-validator-agent ifuri-validator-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deterministic Validator approval for exact head 11e7407bc76b52d051913f9f83ab482f9bb616e8.

Ticket: ticket-049
Correlation ID: todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan
Model: openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2
Reviewed diff chunks: 7
Advisory LLM verdict: APPROVE
Advisory summary: Reviewed all 7 diff chunk(s). Planning-only documentation PR adding ticket-049 through ticket-053 scaffolding, an autonomy audit, operator guide, and refactor plan. All tickets remain in PLAN/WAIT_FOR_APPROVAL state with no executable source or workflow changes. The README adds a pre-push governance gate explanation. Test results show all checks passing. No security concerns identified in the visible diff chunk. | Planning-only PR adding documentation for validator autonomy and operator guidance. The chunk contains markdown documentation (AUTONOMY_AND_REFACTOR_PLAN.md and OPERATOR_GUIDE.md) with no executable source, workflow changes, or secrets. All checks in test_results_data are PASS. | This chunk adds ticket-049 planning documentation (README, changelog, participant file, decisions log, intent.json, logs) and references to the operator guide. The content is documentation-only with no executable source, workflow, or CI changes. The intent.json correctly scopes allowed paths to the ticket directory and index files, and explicitly forbids src/scripts/.github/.governance paths. The decisions.md records an audit trail with a deterministic APPROVE verdict and rejects REQUEST_CHANGES because no unsafe change was found, which is internally consistent. All visible test checks pass (verify, Java adapter, koru/code-review); no failed checks are present. | Planning-only PR scaffolding ticket documentation for tickets 049–052 (intent.json, READMEs, preprompts, changelogs, agent logs). All tickets are in PLAN/WAIT_FOR_APPROVAL state with no executable source, workflow changes, or secrets. JSON is well-formed, allowedPaths/forbiddenPaths are scoped per-ticket, and no dangerous commands are present. Test results show all checks PASS. | This chunk adds planning scaffolding for tickets 051-053 (new project/ticket-* metadata files: README, intent.json, changelog, preprompt, agent logs). All content is documentation/planning-only with no executable source, workflow, or configuration changes. intent.json files define allowed/forbidden paths that correctly exclude src/**, .env.example, workflows, and package files. No secrets or sensitive data are present. Test results show all verify/code-review/adapter checks PASS. | This chunk adds governance documentation and ticket scaffold files for ticket-053 (pre-push governance gate rule in README.md). All changes are documentation-only (README.md, TODO.md, project/TICKETS.md, ticket-053 metadata/logs). No executable source, workflows, secrets, or locked files are modified. The intent.json correctly scopes allowedPaths and forbiddenPaths, explicitly excluding Makefile, AGENTS.md, governance-check.sh, workflows, and src. The agent's deviation from the original plan (Makefile -> AGENTS.md -> README.md) is well-documented with verified governance constraints. Test results show all checks PASS. | Planning-only documentation chunk (tail of a larger diff) for ticket-049 and follow-up tickets 050–052. No executable source, workflow changes, or secrets involved. All checks in test_results_data are PASS (no failed checks).
Advisory findings: none
The LLM output above is advisory and was not used as the approval trust root.
Merge was not requested or performed.

Decision record (recomputable)

DECISION D-049-7149
TICKET ticket-049
HEAD_SHA 11e7407bc76b52d051913f9f83ab482f9bb616e8
CORRELATION_ID todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan
ACTOR agent:ifuri-validator-agent[bot]
APPLIED_RULE P-CORE-015
INPUT author_login = "tom-sapletta-com"
INPUT observed_checks = ["Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","verify=PASS","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","verify=PASS","koru / code-review=PASS","Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","verify=PASS","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS"]
INPUT required_checks = ["verify","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)","koru / code-review"]
INPUT required_checks_source = "env/request"
INPUT reviewer_login = "ifuri-validator-agent[bot]"
VERDICT APPROVE AUTHORITY DETERMINISTIC
REJECTED REQUEST_CHANGES BECAUSE NO_UNSAFE_CHANGE_REASON_FOUND
ADVISORY llm_verdict = "APPROVE" MODEL "openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2"
ASSERT VERDICT_AUTHORITY != "ADVISORY"

Validator append-only log (ticket-032 AC-04).
ifuri-validator-agent[bot]
ifuri-validator-agent Bot previously approved these changes Aug 7, 2026

@ifuri-validator-agent ifuri-validator-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deterministic Validator approval for exact head 979795950dcff9f7d5494b08898a7723b4089231.

Ticket: ticket-049
Correlation ID: todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan
Model: openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2
Reviewed diff chunks: 7
Advisory LLM verdict: APPROVE
Advisory summary: Reviewed all 7 diff chunk(s). This is a docs-only planning PR (ticket-049) adding an autonomy audit, operator guide, and scaffolding follow-up tickets 050–053. No executable source or workflow changes are introduced in this chunk. Test results show all checks PASS. The diff updates README, TODO, TICKETS index, and adds ticket documentation files. | Planning-only documentation PR for ticket-049, adding autonomy audit docs and scaffolding tickets 050-052. All changed files are Markdown documentation; no executable source, workflow, or CI changes are present in this chunk. Test results show all checks passing (verify, Java adapter, koru/code-review). Content describes GitHub Actions dispatch commands and operator procedures but these are instructional text within documentation, not actionable workflow modifications. | Documentation and planning-only chunk for ticket-049. Adds ticket metadata, participant logs, changelog, decision log, and intent.json. No executable source, CI workflow, or secret material is touched. Visible test results contain no failures (verify PASS, Java adapter PASS, koru/code-review PASS, OpenRouter opt-in SKIPPING). | This chunk adds governance evidence and PLAN-stage ticket scaffolding for tickets 049-051: intent files, READMEs, preprompts, agent logs, and changelogs. All content is documentation/planning metadata with no executable code, workflow modifications, or secrets. The intent files declare forbiddenPaths that correctly protect src/scripts/.github and user files. Tickets remain in PLAN/WAIT_FOR_APPROVAL state with explicit non-goals against self-approval and merge. Test results show all checks passing. | This chunk adds planning scaffolding (PLAN/WAIT_FOR_APPROVAL) tickets 050-053: READMEs, changelogs, intent.json files, and preprompt/agent-participant docs. These are documentation-only additions with no executable source, no workflow changes, and no secrets. The intent.json files define appropriate allowed/forbidden paths, forbidden paths include .env.example and package files, preventing unintended scope expansion. Ticket-053 carries a well-reasoned rationale for README.md as the delivery target (governance-owned, unlocked). All tests pass per test_results_data. | This chunk contains ticket-053 documentation files (ai-claude.md, ai-claude-logs.txt, changelog.md, intent.json) and a portion of preprompt.md describing a governance pre-push gate rule added to README.md. The changes are documentation-only with no executable code, workflow modifications, or secret access. The intent.json is well-structured with clearly defined allowed/forbidden paths, non-goals, and validation criteria. The ticket scope was correctly narrowed after discovering governance constraints (GOV-INTEGRATION-001, GOV-SYNC-001) that prevented editing Makefile or AGENTS.md, and the final deliverable (README.md rule) is within the allowed paths. | This chunk contains documentation and planning files for tickets 049-053 (preprompt.md, intent evidence). No executable source, workflow changes, or secrets are present. All visible content is markdown governance/planning metadata with no security risk.
Advisory findings: none
The LLM output above is advisory and was not used as the approval trust root.
Merge was not requested or performed.

Decision record (recomputable)

DECISION D-049-5910
TICKET ticket-049
HEAD_SHA 979795950dcff9f7d5494b08898a7723b4089231
CORRELATION_ID todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan
ACTOR agent:ifuri-validator-agent[bot]
APPLIED_RULE P-CORE-015
INPUT author_login = "tom-sapletta-com"
INPUT observed_checks = ["Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","verify=PASS","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","verify=PASS","koru / code-review=PASS","Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","verify=PASS","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS"]
INPUT required_checks = ["verify","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)","koru / code-review"]
INPUT required_checks_source = "env/request"
INPUT reviewer_login = "ifuri-validator-agent[bot]"
VERDICT APPROVE AUTHORITY DETERMINISTIC
REJECTED REQUEST_CHANGES BECAUSE NO_UNSAFE_CHANGE_REASON_FOUND
ADVISORY llm_verdict = "APPROVE" MODEL "openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2"
ASSERT VERDICT_AUTHORITY != "ADVISORY"

Validator append-only log (ticket-032 AC-04).
ifuri-validator-agent[bot]
ifuri-validator-agent Bot previously approved these changes Aug 7, 2026

@ifuri-validator-agent ifuri-validator-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deterministic Validator approval for exact head 808a0b13abfdeee99bd79502c684088b0c2496de.

Ticket: ticket-049
Correlation ID: todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan
Model: openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2
Reviewed diff chunks: 7
Advisory LLM verdict: BLOCK
Advisory summary: Reviewed all 7 diff chunk(s). Documentation-only PR adding ticket-049 through ticket-053 planning artifacts. The visible diff introduces governance documentation and ticket scaffolding. However, test_results_data includes a failed 'verify' check, which blocks approval regardless of the docs-only nature of the content. | Documentation-only planning content for ticket-049 and follow-up tickets. No executable source, workflow, or secrets changes are present in this chunk. However, the provided test results contain a verify FAIL on one check run, which disallows approval per policy. | This chunk contains planning/documentation files for ticket-049 and sibling tickets. The PR is described as planning-only with no executable source or workflow changes. However, the test results data shows a failed verify check among the reported results, which per the validation rules prevents approval. The decisions.md file also contains a concerning pattern where the validator bot appears to be reviewing/approving a planning documentation PR, and the PR scope involves tickets documenting Validator autonomy for the same repository's governance. | Planning-only governance PR adding ticket scaffolds and docs. intent.json budgets are internally consistent and allowedPaths/forbiddenPaths respect declared non-goals. However, one observed check run reports verify: FAIL, which prohibits approval. | This diff chunk scaffolds PLAN/WAIT_FOR_APPROVAL governance tickets (051–053) with documentation, intent.json, preprompt, changelog, and agent participant files. The ticket content is well-structured, with explicit non-goals (no ambient env restoration, no Validator self-trigger, no workflow changes in planning tickets). However, the provided test_results_data contains failing checks: one 'verify: FAIL' is listed among the results. Per the strict validation rule, a failed check mandates a non-APPROVE verdict, and because this is accompanied by test failure rather than a security issue, the most conservative consistent verdict is BLOCK given the failing test signal. | Documentation-only governance scaffolding for ticket-053 (and sibling planning tickets 049-052). The chunk adds ticket metadata, intent.json, changelog, agent logs, and design rationale. It documents that Makefile and AGENTS.md edits were intentionally avoided due to governance lock constraints, placing the pre-push rule in README.md instead. No executable source, workflow, or secret-bearing code is touched in this chunk. | This chunk contains planning/evidence documentation for tickets 049-053, including acceptance criteria evidence for ticket-053 governance work. The changes are documentation-only and introduce no executable source, workflow modifications, or secrets. However, the PR body describes this as a planning-only PR for ticket-049, yet the chunk also scaffolds tickets 050-053 and includes ticket-053 preprompt content that references wrapping governance-check.sh in CI form — which implies executable/workflow changes that are out of scope for a plan-only PR. The test_results_data shows a verify failure on the first run, which cannot be ignored.
Advisory findings: {'id': 'TEST_FAIL_VERIFY', 'severity': 'high', 'description': "test_results_data contains a failed 'verify' check ('verify: FAIL'). Per validation rules, approval is blocked when any check fails. Even if the failure is due to pre-existing branch-level diagnostics (GOV-INTENT-003 / GOV-TICKET-001 as described in the README addition), the failing check must be resolved or confirmed non-applicable before merge."}; {'id': 'B1', 'severity': 'high', 'description': "test_results_data contains a failed check: 'verify: FAIL'. Policy forbids APPROVE while any check has failed, regardless of the documentation-only nature of this diff chunk. The failing check must be resolved or the failure reconciled (e.g., confirmed flaky/retried-green with evidence) before approval.", 'location': 'test_results_data'}; Test results data contains a failed check: verify: FAIL appears in the reported test results. Per validation rules, never APPROVE when test_results_data contains a failed check.; Test results include verify: FAIL for one check run; policy forbids approval when any check has failed.; test_results_data includes a 'verify: FAIL' entry. No PR with a failing check may be approved; the failure must be investigated and resolved or shown to be a non-applicable/flaky result before approval.; test_results_data contains a failed check (verify: FAIL appears once alongside passing runs). Per the validation rules, a failed check precludes APPROVE even when the failure appears duplicated by a later passing run in the same data.; test_results_data contains a failed check ('verify: FAIL' in the first result set). Per review rules, never APPROVE when test_results_data contains a failed check.; Scope mismatch: PR body states this is planning-only with no executable source or workflow change, but ticket-053/preprompt.md describes wrapping project/governance-check.sh in its CI form, implying changes to executable/Makefile/workflow surfaces that are not present in this documentation-only diff. Clarify scope or exclude ticket-053 executable directives from a plan-only PR.; {'id': 'S1', 'severity': 'info', 'description': 'No secrets, tokens, or credentials are exposed in this diff chunk. The force=true input in dispatch commands is a documented operational flag for live review and is appropriate given the guidance to dry-run first with force=false. No .env access or workflow modification observed.', 'location': 'diff_chunk_data'}; decisions.md contains appended decision records where ifuri-validator-agent[bot] issued APPROVE verdicts with AUTHORITY DETERMINISTIC on PRs authored by tom-sapletta-com for this same repository. This appears to be a self-review governance concern: the validator is reviewing governance/documentation changes that define its own autonomy rules. The trust-root principle documented in the ticket itself states 'reviewer outside the reviewed repository' — decisions recorded inside the reviewed repository's planning docs may conflate the review boundary. No secrets or credentials are exposed in this chunk.
The LLM output above is advisory and was not used as the approval trust root.
Merge was not requested or performed.

Decision record (recomputable)

DECISION D-049-8989
TICKET ticket-049
HEAD_SHA 808a0b13abfdeee99bd79502c684088b0c2496de
CORRELATION_ID todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan
ACTOR agent:ifuri-validator-agent[bot]
APPLIED_RULE P-CORE-015
INPUT author_login = "tom-sapletta-com"
INPUT observed_checks = ["Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","verify=FAIL","Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","verify=PASS","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","koru / code-review=PASS","Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","verify=PASS","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS"]
INPUT required_checks = ["verify","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)","koru / code-review"]
INPUT required_checks_source = "env/request"
INPUT reviewer_login = "ifuri-validator-agent[bot]"
VERDICT APPROVE AUTHORITY DETERMINISTIC
REJECTED REQUEST_CHANGES BECAUSE NO_UNSAFE_CHANGE_REASON_FOUND
ADVISORY llm_verdict = "BLOCK" MODEL "openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2"
ASSERT VERDICT_AUTHORITY != "ADVISORY"

Validator append-only log (ticket-032 AC-04).
ifuri-validator-agent[bot]
ifuri-validator-agent Bot previously approved these changes Aug 7, 2026

@ifuri-validator-agent ifuri-validator-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deterministic Validator approval for exact head 1a9e04eca27b23bfe94a2ff885784455681dfaca.

Ticket: ticket-049
Correlation ID: todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan
Model: openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2
Advisory LLM review: LLM_UNAVAILABLE
Reason: LLM response scalar fields have invalid types
This approval rests on the deterministic checks alone; no advisory opinion was recorded for this head.
Merge was not requested or performed.

Decision record (recomputable)

DECISION D-049-2111
TICKET ticket-049
HEAD_SHA 1a9e04eca27b23bfe94a2ff885784455681dfaca
CORRELATION_ID todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan
ACTOR agent:ifuri-validator-agent[bot]
APPLIED_RULE P-CORE-015
INPUT author_login = "tom-sapletta-com"
INPUT observed_checks = ["Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","verify=PASS","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","verify=PASS","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","koru / code-review=PASS","Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","verify=PASS"]
INPUT required_checks = ["verify","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)","koru / code-review"]
INPUT required_checks_source = "env/request"
INPUT reviewer_login = "ifuri-validator-agent[bot]"
VERDICT APPROVE AUTHORITY DETERMINISTIC
REJECTED REQUEST_CHANGES BECAUSE NO_UNSAFE_CHANGE_REASON_FOUND
ADVISORY llm_verdict = "" MODEL "openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2"
ASSERT VERDICT_AUTHORITY != "ADVISORY"

Validator append-only log (ticket-032 AC-04).
ifuri-validator-agent[bot]
ifuri-validator-agent Bot previously approved these changes Aug 7, 2026

@ifuri-validator-agent ifuri-validator-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deterministic Validator approval for exact head 06c98dec944fbb1eabe7d92737e5b96b6a5919cd.

Ticket: ticket-049
Correlation ID: todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan
Model: openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2
Reviewed diff chunks: 7
Advisory LLM verdict: APPROVE
Advisory summary: Reviewed all 7 diff chunk(s). Planning-only documentation PR (ticket-049) adding autonomy audit, operator guide, and scaffolding tickets 050–053. All changed files are Markdown documentation with no executable source, workflow, or configuration changes. Test results show all required checks passing (verify, Java adapter, koru/code-review). | Planning-only PR adding documentation under project/ticket-049 (autonomy plan, operator guide) and scaffolding follow-up tickets 050-052. The visible diff contains only markdown documentation: operational guidance, decision logs, dependency graphs, and verification commands. No executable source, workflow, or config changes. No secrets or credentials exposed. Test results show all checks passing (verify PASS, Java adapter PASS, koru/code-review PASS; live OpenRouter opt-in SKIPPING). | Documentation/planning-only chunk for ticket-049 and scaffolds for tickets 050-052. Adds audit docs, operator guide, refactor plan, decision logs, and ticket metadata. No executable source, workflow, or CI changes visible. All tests in test_results_data are PASS or SKIPPING with no failures. | Planning-only documentation PR adding ticket-049 (autonomy audit, operator guide, refactor plan) and scaffolding tickets 050-052. Changes are restricted to markdown/JSON evidence files under project/ticket-049/** through project/ticket-052/** with minor root doc updates. No executable source, workflow, or package changes are included. The DSL fragments in the diff contain decision records showing the validator correctly rejected REQUEST_CHANGES and handled a verify=FAIL case deterministically, with advisory LLM verdicts properly asserted as non-authoritative. No failed checks present in test_results_data; all required checks (verify, Java adapter, koru / code-review) report PASS. | This chunk adds planning-only scaffolding for tickets 051, 052, and 053 (README, changelog, intent.json, preprompt.md, agent participant files). No executable source, workflow, or configuration changes are present. All new tickets are PLAN/WAIT_FOR_APPROVAL status. Intent.json files correctly forbid .env.example, src/**, and package.json. No secrets, no env reads, no workflow modifications, no merge-approval logic. All test checks in test_results_data show PASS or SKIPPING (opt-in); no failures. | Documentation-only changes for ticket-053 adding a pre-push governance gate obligation to README.md, plus ticket scaffold files (logs, changelog, intent, agent notes). No executable source, workflow, or public-interface changes. Test results show all checks passing. The intent.json correctly scopes allowed/forbidden paths and the changelog documents constraints verification (Makefile/AGENTS.md cannot be modified). Content is consistent with stated scope. | This PR is a planning-only change set for ticket-049 and follow-up tickets 050–053. The visible diff chunk contains only the tail of ticket-053/intent.json (JSON metadata for a documented pre-push governance rule in README.md) and the new file ticket-053/preprompt.md (15 lines of prose instructions). No executable source, workflow, .env, Makefile, or locked governance file is modified. The content is documentation/metadata only. No security risks are present.
Advisory findings: none
The LLM output above is advisory and was not used as the approval trust root.
Merge was not requested or performed.

Decision record (recomputable)

DECISION D-049-6634
TICKET ticket-049
HEAD_SHA 06c98dec944fbb1eabe7d92737e5b96b6a5919cd
CORRELATION_ID todo2code-pr-ticket-049-plan
ACTOR agent:ifuri-validator-agent[bot]
APPLIED_RULE P-CORE-015
INPUT author_login = "tom-sapletta-com"
INPUT observed_checks = ["Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","verify=PASS","Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS","verify=PASS","koru / code-review=PASS","Live OpenRouter contract (opt-in)=SKIPPING","verify=PASS","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)=PASS"]
INPUT required_checks = ["verify","Java adapter (JDK 17 required)","koru / code-review"]
INPUT required_checks_source = "env/request"
INPUT reviewer_login = "ifuri-validator-agent[bot]"
VERDICT APPROVE AUTHORITY DETERMINISTIC
REJECTED REQUEST_CHANGES BECAUSE NO_UNSAFE_CHANGE_REASON_FOUND
ADVISORY llm_verdict = "APPROVE" MODEL "openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.2"
ASSERT VERDICT_AUTHORITY != "ADVISORY"

Validator append-only log (ticket-032 AC-04).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant