Skip to content

docs(rfc): stovepipe record step design - #394

Open
mnoah1 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
mnoah1/record-step
Open

docs(rfc): stovepipe record step design#394
mnoah1 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
mnoah1/record-step

Conversation

@mnoah1

@mnoah1 mnoah1 commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Design proposal for the record step outlined in stovepipe's workflow.md

@mnoah1
mnoah1 marked this pull request as ready for review July 16, 2026 19:33
@mnoah1
mnoah1 requested review from a team, behinddwalls and sbalabanov as code owners July 16, 2026 19:33
Comment thread doc/rfc/stovepipe/steps/record.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/rfc/stovepipe/steps/record.md Outdated
Comment thread doc/rfc/stovepipe/steps/record.md Outdated
@mnoah1
mnoah1 force-pushed the mnoah1/record-step branch from 5b12645 to 4dc7628 Compare August 4, 2026 20:13
@mnoah1
mnoah1 force-pushed the mnoah1/record-step branch from 4dc7628 to 7b28df2 Compare August 4, 2026 20:22
| `Project` | Empty for the whole repository; stable project id for Phase 2 |
| `Degree` | Health degree in the closed interval `[0, 1]`; `0` is green and `1` is fully broken |
| `RequestID` | Request that established the fact |
| `CreatedAt` | Millisecond timestamp at which the fact was first recorded |

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thoughts on timestamp? We don't track timestamps elsewhere in the system but for these more long-term persisted facts, do we want to maintain some kind of timestamped history?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants