feat: update Makefile

[JuArce]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Codex Code Review

• Medium – Sensitive RPC credentials are printed (claim_contracts/Makefile:66). ETH_RPC and BASE_RPC commonly contain provider API keys, but the target prints their full values. Treat them like ETHERSCAN_API_KEY and print only set/MISSING.

• Low – Sourced values do not reach deployment (claim_contracts/Makefile:62). launch-env runs in a prerequisite’s separate shell, so sourced variables are discarded before the deployment recipe starts. This is especially misleading for ETHERSCAN_API_KEY: it may report set, while Forge receives the outer environment’s value or nothing. Source/export the file in the deployment recipe itself, or avoid implying that its values are used.

[claude]

Low: launch-env prints every var in LAUNCH_ENV_VARS in cleartext (line ~77 printf ' %-24s %s\n' "$$v" "$$val"), including DEPLOYER. Everywhere else in this Makefile the deployer secret is named DEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY (e.g. line 29), so DEPLOYER reads like it should be the address — but the name alone doesn't enforce that. If an operator populates the launch-env file by copy-pasting from a different convention and puts a private key under DEPLOYER, this target will echo it straight to the terminal/CI log right before a mainnet deploy. Consider renaming to DEPLOYER_ADDRESS (or adding a comment noting it must be an address, never a key) to remove the ambiguity.

[claude]

Review

Small, well-scoped Makefile change (adds a launch-env pre-flight target for the mainnet airdrop deploys). Traced through the shell logic (. "$(LAUNCH_ENV)", the eval "val=\${$v:-}" indirect-expansion trick, the printf calls) and it's correct — no shell/format-string injection, and ETHERSCAN_API_KEY is correctly kept out of the "reported" set of values that get printed.

Security: No Critical/High/Medium issues. One Low-severity note posted inline: the printed DEPLOYER var could be confused with the codebase's DEPLOYER_PRIVATE_KEY naming convention and accidentally leak a key to logs if operator error puts a key there instead of an address.

Bugs / logic: None found. launch-env is correctly a diagnostic-only step (values don't propagate to the deploy recipe's own subshell, and missing vars don't block the deploy) — matches the stated intent in the comments.

Simplicity: The target is appropriately minimal for what it does (loop + eval + printf), no unnecessary abstraction.

No other issues found.